|
|
|
|
TO: The Apostolate of God’s Victory FROM: William Kamm / the ‘Little Pebble DATE: 26th March, 2002 Peace be to all those who signed their names to the document named "Time to Leave" and those who accept the document. The letter that was issued last week and dated the 21st – 22nd February, 2002, was well written and well planned. It was allegedly written, as explained – or should I say, dictated - by Saint Joan of Arc. It is strange how the tide turns when only last year Saint Joan dictated to the same person – Glenn Talaue – to remain firmly behind the ‘Little Rock’ who is the ‘Rock of Truth’. It is over twenty years now, since 1982 – when I first received a public revelation – and through hundreds of Seers God has always addressed me in the same way, as the ‘Rock of Truth! How amazing! Where there is truth there is no lie; no deception. How is it that every Seer or Privileged soul who has ever crossed my path received countless Messages supporting myself as Prophet, the last Pope, and ‘Little Abraham’ – God’s ‘Rock’. Then years later receive the opposite, where the attacks are always on the two ‘Pillars’ of my Mission, namely the Papacy and ‘Little Abraham’, in his Royal House of David. Would it not be proper to say: if the Seers had known of these mysteries when they first came into the Mission – revealed to them personally by Heaven – they should have rejected it then, but did not as they knew it was from God. Yet years later, they decide it is not from Heaven. So what does that say? Their Messages earlier on were not true, but are now? To say "reason is absent", I would totally disagree. Reason is based upon evidence or our conscience being informed at all times, thus being able to act upon reason, for reason also supports our faith in what is believed with the support from Church and Spiritual Teachings. Through countless writings supported by Church Teaching we have demonstrated that with all reason of faith we have proceeded to comply with God’s designs. If your faith was so blind that you over-looked the obvious – what, then, was the obvious as you so clearly state? There is nothing obviously clear by your writings. There was no mystery in the Papacy – no mystery in all the revelations. The only mystery that we were dealing with was a Mystical Marriage which, in essence, was a marriage that had a mystery as it pertained to the Old Church and the New. What you have clearly stated and revealed in your writings, is nothing new to the reader, as this is already eleven years old and well known, even in Church Hierarchical circles. Then we have the question of the Royal House of David. There was nothing to justify in this - as Church Teaching supports the issue of multiple wives! You have clearly read this Teaching, but you have now become influenced by weak souls and have succumbed to untruth, believing it to be a lie what God has been revealing since 1990. The mystery is the Holy Staff and man’s free will to utilize God’s Gifts accordingly. All of this was easily explained through countless writings. Yes, there is justification in truth, and good reason to follow this truth – always open to souls of good will, and also open to the Church authorities. God does not reveal all mysteries in their fullness until a given time when man is ready to accept, but that does not make God a liar. He reveals when and to whom He wishes as He did regarding the Incarnation to the Virgin Mary, and not explaining it to Saint Joseph who acted upon human reason to divorce Her, but later was assured, in a mere dream, not to use human reason only, for God’s Mysteries. As always, it was, and still is, up to the Church to make its judgement upon these Mysteries, which I have been waiting so long to give to them, so that they can make a clear definition and give clarify God’s Words so all mankind will understand the Mystery of God’s Will. But you, like so many before you, believe you have the answers on human reasoning and human judgement, when you yourselves had the truth of these matters for many years – but now openly deny the truth. God does not promise something for countless years and then change His Mind. To say that Prophecy has shifted, is a laugh. By whom, and on what authority – yours? And who are you: Glenn, Wally, little Beau, Peter and Josie Gruneklee? You have foolishly succumbed to your weaknesses in desiring to be heard by your peers rather than follow the truth. It is for this reason I said to you, Glenn: "Would you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?" You say you were a "tower of strength" for me – the "backbone"! You were simply a good friend, Glenn, and you did help me. It is said in the letter: "Sent Without Prejudice – sent with good will". Where is the good will, when this was planned for many months? The Sanhedrin plotted and planned the Death of Jesus. As stated by Caiphas: "It is better that one man die for the people" - to save their lives, rather than the truth be explained. They called me their friend, yet planned this attack upon me. If they were my friends, why did they not simply come to me and say: "William I cannot accept this" - and leave it at that, for every man has a right to his belief. But to undermine me; to plot against me; to bring this public attack upon me - by stealing the mailing-list, by speaking to Community members to obtain private and personal details, as Judas and the Pharisees did, is not a sign of a person of good intent. They will always say as others do, as even the Media says – people have a right to know. Yes, people have a right to know the truth, through the proper channels through a Church Investigation, not a Kangaroo Court of detractors simply because they do not understand all that God reveals, using their human logic as the recourse to their arguments. Nothing has ever been hidden from God’s children, if they sought to know and understand. You say you came to correct me. If all that was revealed from 1982 – 1990, and supported by all Seers united at a given time - including yourselves when you received the same revelation - who is correcting whom? And what is more despicable, to say the least, is that the "Alliance of Truth", which was formed by myself, Father Broussard and Glenn – being the moderators – was closed down by you, Glenn, without our approval or knowledge. That in itself is a breach of trust and a breach of confidentiality. Is this the action of a person who is guided by Heaven? Under normal circumstances you would be sue, as it is against ethical practices. You truly believe that you have triumphed! Far from it! Already most people on the "Alliance of Truth" have continued their support, as well as most on the world mailing list. It is sad to think that you believe you have the sway and numbers to foil this work. You quote issues from the Media to place dark shades upon my name when quoting that I tried to seduce people into giving their money to me. This you know very well is far from the truth. Let any man come forward and claim this. I would stand on oath in Court any time to repudiate this, and many other accusations. If you were truly a man of honour, Glenn – and the others too – you would simply have resigned from this Mission and left it with God and His Church. You say you have handed a ton of evidence to support your claim to the Church! What are you trying to convey to the public that they were not aware of – when in fact due to the worldwide Media attack upon me, the public has become aware of everything? As for the Church: they have always been informed – good and bad – of all that has transpired. How then does your letter of some years ago – your affidavit of appraisal of this Mission as coming from the Hand of God, which you sent to the Church Authorities – now stand? Many of you owe your conversion to it. Do you not think the Church will look upon this current action as laughable, considering they never accepted us/you before? Do you truly believe they will accept you now? I have never had anything to hide. It was for this very reason I approached the Church regarding an Investigation. As for the private Messages relating to my private life: this was only going to be revealed through the Church Investigation, not through the interrogation of the Media, or souls that had scrupulous faith. Your argument - faith without reason – has no foundation. They are pretty words, and that is as far as it goes. You said that: "Most of us who leave you today were your strongest followers!" I beg to differ. Some of you were strong supporters, but not the strongest supporters, for they are still with me, and have remained so from 1982 onwards. I am grateful and will always be grateful for the support given by those who signed, but only a handful were truly strong; who never wavered until now. Your way of expressing this to the public gives them the idea that those who signed formed the bulk of our Order in Australia, when in fact this is not so. You say that: "The Order is now in shambles!" Who said? Just because a few members have left does not constitute a shambled breakdown of the Order. Our Community alone has about one-hundred and eighty-five members – and worldwide it has more support than you realize. Let the truth be the truth. I reiterate: there is no such thing as a shift in Prophecy. They can only be mitigated, or delayed – but predestined and singled-out souls remain in God’s Divine and unchangeable Plans. You said that: "You will be persecuted because of your decision!" I do not think so. A person is only persecuted when defending the truth. Since when is a Mission ours? I thought all Missions belonged to God! Think carefully, Glenn, of where the hypocrisy lies. I leave this letter is in the eyes of the beholder to pray and discern. Be assured that my prayers are with you all, as there will come a time when the truth will be revealed for what it is. I leave you with this vision from Saint Catherine Emmerich, who has been my hope, especially in this time when it is being fulfilled before our very eyes. "Last night I had a vision of the Pope. I saw Saint Francis carrying the Church, and the Basilica of Saint Peter borne on the shoulders of a little man who had something of the Jew in his countenance. It looked very perilous. Mary stood on the north side of the Church with Her mantle extended over it. The little man was almost bent double. He is, as yet, a laic. I know who he is. The twelve men whom I always see as the twelve new Apostles, ought to have helped him, but they arrived too late; however, just as he was about to fall, they all ran up with myriads of Angels to his assistance." Who is this man, Glenn? Your brother and friend. William Kamm – the ‘Little Pebble’ |
|
Send mail to mwoa@shoal.net.au with
questions or comments about this web site.
|
